What is MCP?

Model Context Protocol (MCP) is an open-source standard for integrating AI applications to external systems. With AI use cases getting traction more and more, it becomes evident that AI applications tend to connect to multiple data sources to provide intelligent and relevant responses.

Earlier AI systems interacted with users through Large language Models (LLM) that leveraged pre-trained datasets. Then, in larger organizations, business users work with AI applications/agents expect more relevant responses from enterprise dataset, from where Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) came into play.

Now, AI applications/agents are expected to produce more accurate responses leveraging latest data, that requires AI systems to interact with multiple data sources and fetch accurate information. When multi-system interactions are established, it requires the communication protocol to be more standardized and scalable. That is where MCP enables a standardized way to connect AI applications to external systems.

Architecture

Using MCP, AI applications can connect to data source (ex; local files, databases), tools and workflows – enabling them to access key information and perform tasks. In enterprises scenario, AI applications/agents can connect to multiple databases across organization, empowering users to analyze data using natural language chat.

Benefits of MCP

MCP serves a wide range of benefits

• Development: MCP reduces development time and complexity when building, or integrating with AI application/agent. It makes integrating MCP host with multiple MCP servers simple by leveraging built-in capability discovery feature.
• AI applications or agents: MCP provides access to an ecosystem of data sources, tools and apps which will enhance capabilities and improve the end-user experience.
• End-users: MCP results in more capable AI applications or agents which can access your data and take actions on user behalf when necessary.

MCP – Concepts

At the top level of MCP concepts, there are three entities,

• Participants
• Layers
• Data Layer Protocol

Participants

MCP follows a client-server architecture where an MCP host – an AI application like enterprise chatbot establishes connections to one or more MCP servers. The MCP host accomplishes this by creating a MCP client for each MCP server. Each MCP client maintains a dedicated connection with its MCP server.

The key participants of MCP architecture are:

• MCP Host: AI application that coordinates and manages one or more MCP clients
• MCP Client: A component that maintains a dedicated connection to an MCP server and obtains context from an MCP server for MCP host to interact
• MCP Server: A program that provides context to MCP clients (i.e. generate responses or perform actions on user behalf)

Layers

MCP consists of two layers:

• Data layer – Defines JSON-RPC based protocol for client-server communication including,
  • lifecycle management – initiate connection, capability discovery & negotiation, connection termination
  • Core primitives – enabling server features like tools for AI actions, resources for context data, prompt templates for client-server interaction and client features like ask client to sample from host LLM, log messages to client
  • Utility features – Additional capabilities like real-time notifications, track progress for long-running operations
• Transport Layer – Manages communication channels and authentication between clients and servers. It handles connection establishment, message framing and secure communication between MCP participants

Data Layer Protocol

The core part of MCP is defining the schema and semantics between MCP clients and MCP servers. It is the part of MCP that defines the ways developers can share context from MCP servers to MCP clients.

MCP uses JSON-RPC 2.0 as its underlying RPC protocol. Client and servers send requests to each other and respond accordingly. Notifications can be used when no response is required.

Life Cycle Management

MCP is a stateful protocol that requires lifecycle management. The purpose of lifecycle management is to negotiate the capabilities (i.e. functionalities) that both client and server support.

Primitives

Primitives define what clients and servers can offer each other. These primitives specify the types of contextual information that can be shared with AI applications and the range of actions that can be performed. MCP defines three core primitives that servers can expose:

• Tools: Executable functions that AI applications can invoke to perform actions (e.g., API calls, database queries)
• Resources: Data sources that provide contextual information to AI applications (e.g., file contents, API responses, database records)
• Prompts: Reusable templates that help structure interactions with language models (e.g., system prompts, few-shot examples)

Notifications

The protocol supports real-time notifications to enable dynamic updates between servers and clients. For example, when a server’s available tools change – such as when new functionalities are added or existing functionality is updated – the server can send tool update notifications to all its connected clients about these changes.

Security in Data Accessing

While AI applications communicate with multiple enterprise data sources thgrouch MCP and fetch real-time sensitive data like customer information, financial data to serve the users, data security becomes absolutely critical factor to be addressed.

MCP ensures secure access.

Authentication and Authorization

MCP implements server-side authentication where each MCP server validates who is making the request. The enterprise system controls access through:

• User-specific credentials – Each user connecting through MCP has their own authentication tokens
• Role-based access control (RBAC) – Users only access data that the role permits
• Session management – Time-limited sessions that expire automatically

Data Access Controls

MCP server acts as a security gateway that enforces the same access policies as direct system access:

• • Users can only query data that they are authroized to access
  • The server validates every request against permission rules
  • Sensitive information can be masked or filtered based on user privileges

Secure Communication

• • • Encrypted connections – All data transmissions uses TLS/HTTPS encryption
    • No data storage in AI – AI systems do not store the financial data it accesses; it only process it during the conversation session

Audit and Monitoring

MCP implementations in enterprise ecosystem should include:

• • • Complete audit logs – Every data access request is logged with user, timestamp and data accessed
    • Anomaly detection – Engage mechanisms that monitor unusual access patterns and trigger alerts
    • Compliance tracking – All interactions meet regulatory requirements like GDPR, PCI-DSS

Architecture Isolation

Enterprises typically deploy MCP using:

• • • Private network deployment – MCP servers stay within the enterprise secure firewall boundary
    • API gateway integration – Requests go through existing security infrastructure
    • No direct database access – MCP connects and access data through secure APIs, not direct access to database

The main idea is that MCP does not bypass existing security. It works within the same security as other enterprise applications, just showing a smarter interface.

MCP Implementation & Demonstration

In this section, I will demonstrate a simple use case where MCP client (Claude Desktop) interacts with “Finance Manager” MCP server that can fetch financial information from the database.

Financial data is maintained in Postgres database tables. MCP client (Claude Desktop app) will request information about customer account, MCP host will discover appropriate capability based on user prompt and invoke respective MCP tool function that can fetch data from the database table.

To make MCP client-server in action, there are three parts to be configured

• • • Backend Database
    • MCP server implementation
    • MCP server registration in MCP Host

Backend Database

Postgres table “accounts” maintains accounts data with below information, “transactions” table maintains the transaction performed on the accounts

MCP server implementation

FastMCP class implements MCP server components and creating an object of it initialize and enables access to those components to create enterprise MCP server capabilities.

The annotation “@mcp.tool()” defines the capability and the respective function will be recognized as MCP capability. These functions will be exposed to AI applications and will be invoked from MCP Host to perform designated actions.

In order to invoke MCP capabilities from client, MCP server should be up & running. In this example, there are two functions defined as MCP tool capabilities,

• • • get_account_details – The function accept account number as input parameter, query “accounts” table and returns account information
    • add_transaction – The function accepts account number and transaction amount as parameters, make entry into “transactions” table

MCP Server Registration in MCP Host

For AI applications to invoke MCP server capability, MCP server should be registered in MCP host at client end. For this demonstration, I am using Claude Desktop as MCP client from where I interact with MCP server.

First, MCP server is registered with MCP host in Claude Desktop as below,

Claude Desktop -> Settings -> Developer -> Local MCP Servers -> Click “Edit Config”

Open “claude_desktop_config” JSON file in Notepad. Add configurations in the JSON as below. The configurations define the path where MCP server implementation is located and instruct command to MCP host to run. Save the file and close.

Restart “Claude Desktop” application, go to Settings -> Developer -> Local MCP servers tab. The newly added MCP server (finance-manager) will be in running state as below,

Go to chat window in Claude Desktop. Issue a prompt to fetch details of an account in “accounts” table and review the response,

User Prompt: User issues a prompt to fetch details of an account.

MCP Discovery & Invoke: The client (Claude Desktop) processes the prompt, interacts with MCP host, automatically discover the relevant capability – get_account_details function in this case – without explicitly mention the function name and invoke the function with necessary parameter.

Response: MCP server process the request, fetch account details from the table and respond details to the client. The client formats the response and present it to the user.

Another example to add a transaction in the backend table for an account,

Here, “add_transaction” capability has been invoked to add a transaction record in “transactions” table. In the chat window, you could notice that what MCP function is being invoked along with request & response body.

The record has been successfully added into the table,

Impressive, isn’t it..!!

There are a wide range of use cases implementing MCP servers and integrate with enterprise AI systems that bring in intelligent layer to interact with enterprise data sources.

Here, you may also develop a thought that in what ways MCP (Model Context Protocol) is different from RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation), as I did so. Based on my research, I just curated a comparison matrix of the features that would add more clarity,

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence has sparked a broad spectrum of opinions across society, with strong arguments both supporting and opposing its implementation. On one side, many view AI-driven tools as transformative, bringing remarkable progress to sectors such as healthcare, education, and transportation, while also fueling innovation and research. On the other side, skeptics raise valid concerns about the reliability of AI-generated medical diagnoses and the safeguarding of sensitive patient information. Additional worries include potential job displacement, widened socioeconomic divides, the environmental impact caused by energy-intensive systems, and the accumulation of electronic waste—issues that question the long-term sustainability of these technologies.

Artificial intelligence undeniably continues to shape our society, emphasizing the urgency for individuals and organizations to establish ethical guidelines that encourage its responsible and transparent application. Here I share some key recommendations, to ensure AI is implemented conscientiously:

• Organizations should appoint dedicated teams to oversee AI development and usage. They must also outline clear policies that guarantee ethical and responsible practices
• It is crucial to design strategies for identifying and mitigating biases embedded in AI systems to prevent outcomes that could compromise human dignity or foster discrimination.
• Datasets utilized in AI training must be inclusive and representative of diverse populations, ensuring fairness across societal groups.
• Privacy and security measures should prioritize safeguarding data used by AI systems as well as data they generate.
• Transparency  in AI decision-making processes, operations, and applications.
• Organizations should implement tools that clearly and understandably explain how their AI systems operate and how they utilize them.
• Controls should be established to mediate or override critical decisions made by AI systems. Human oversight is vital for ensuring such decisions align with ethical principles.
• Compliance with relevant regulatory frameworks, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), must be strictly maintained.

As the pace of AI innovation accelerates and new tools emerge, it is equally important to continuously refine ethical frameworks governing their function. This adaptability promotes sustained responsible usage, effectively addressing new challenges over time.

While challenges related to regulation and implementation remain significant, the opportunities created by artificial intelligence are boundless—offering immense potential to enrich society for the greater good.

References:

• No title. (s/f). Unesco.org. Recovered on Jan 7th, 2026 from https://www.unesco.org/es/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics 
• García, L. P. (2025, enero 8). Interacción entre la ética y la Inteligencia Artificial. Labor Hospitalaria. https://www.laborhospitalaria.com/interaccion-entre-la-etica-y-la-inteligencia-artificial/ 
• Social, R., & De personas, H. (2024, diciembre 26). Riesgos éticos en el uso de la inteligencia artificial. Deloitte. https://www.deloitte.com/latam/es/services/risk-advisory/perspectives/riesgos-eticos-en-el-uso-de-la-inteligencia-artificial.html 
• Artificial, a. I. (s/f). Ética en la Inteligencia Artificial. Ibero.mx. Recovered on Jan 7th, 2026 from https://revistas.ibero.mx/ibero/uploads/volumenes/69/pdf/6-etica-en-la-inteligencia-artificial.pdf 

Nowadays, a person cannot live without some interaction with artificial intelligence, ranging from mobile apps to enterprise tools that use data and algorithms to help businesses make better decisions. What exactly are the main types of AI workloads? Let’s break them down in simple terms using real examples:

Natural Language Processing: How AI Understands Human Language

NLP is the name given to computers reading, understanding, and responding to human language.

Real-Life Examples

• Chatbots: Customer support bots reply to your queries instantly.
• Sentiment Analysis: AI shows brands whether posts on social media mention them positively or negatively.
• Language: Tools like Google Translate convert text between languages.

Computer Vision: Teaching Machines to See

With Computer Vision, machines can comprehend and interpret images and videos much like humans do.

Real-Life Examples

• Facial Recognition: Unlock your phone with your face.
• Object Detection: Self-driving cars identify pedestrians and traffic signs.
• Medical Imaging: This application enables doctors to detect diseases in X-rays or MRI scans using AI.

Predictive Models: AI Capable of Predicting the Future

Predictive models use historical data to predict future outcomes.

Real-Life Examples

• Sales Forecasting: Businesses predict monthly revenue.
• Fraud Detection: Banks detect suspicious transactions.
• Customer Churn Prediction: Companies predict which customers are likely to leave.

Conversational AI: Smart Chatbots & Virtual Assistants

Conversational AI is the technology behind systems that enable machines to have conversations with you in natural language.

Real-Life Examples

• Azure Bot Service: Customer support.
• Cortana: Virtual assistant provided by Microsoft.
• Customer Service Bots: You know, those helpful chat windows on websites.

Generative AI: Creating New Content with AI

Generative AI generates new text, images, or even code from learned patterns.

Real-life Examples

• GPT-4: can write blogs, answer questions, and even help with coding.
• DALL-E: Creates striking images out of textual prompts.
• Codex: Computer code from natural language instructions

Why Understanding AI Workloads Matters

Artificial Intelligence is no longer relegated to the pages of science fiction; it’s part of our daily lives. From Natural Language Processing powering chatbots to Computer Vision enabling facial recognition, and from Predictive Models forecasting trends to Generative AI creating new content, these workloads form the backbone of most modern AI applications.

A proper understanding of these key AI workloads will help businesses and individuals leverage AI to improve efficiency, enhance customer experience, and remain productive in a digitally evolving world. Whether you are a technology-savvy person, a business leader, or just an inquisitive mind about AI, knowing these basics gives you a clear picture of how AI is shaping the future.

Additional Reading

• What is Artificial Intelligence (AI)? / Blogs / Perficient
• What is Microsoft Copilot Studio? / Blogs / Perficient

Large language models are powerful communicators but poor historians — they generate fluent answers without guaranteed grounding. Retrieval‑Augmented Generation (RAG) is the enterprise-ready pattern that remedies this: it pairs a retrieval layer that finds authoritative content with an LLM that synthesizes a response, producing answers you can trust and audit.

How RAG works — concise flow

• Index authoritative knowledge (manuals, SOPs, product specs, policies).
• Convert content to searchable artifacts (text chunks, vectors, or indexed documents).
• At query time, retrieve the most relevant passages and pass them to the LLM as context.
• The LLM generates a response conditioned on those passages and returns the answer with citations or source snippets.

RAG architectures — choose based on needs

• Vector-based RAG: semantic search via embeddings — best for unstructured content and paraphrased queries.
• Retriever‑Reader (search + synthesize): uses an external search engine for candidate retrieval and an LLM to synthesize — balances speed and interpretability.
• Hybrid (BM25 + embeddings): combines lexical and semantic signals for higher recall and precision.

Practical implementation checklist

• Curate sources: prioritize canonical documents and enforce access controls for sensitive data.
• Chunk and preprocess: split long documents into meaningful passages (200–1000 tokens) and normalize text.
• Select embeddings: evaluate cost vs. semantic fidelity for your chosen model.
• Tune retrieval: experiment with top‑k, score thresholds, and reranking to reduce noise.
• Prompt engineering: require source attribution and instruct the model to respond “I don’t know” when evidence is absent.
• Maintain pipeline: set reindex schedules or event-driven updates and monitor for stale content.

Risks and mitigations

• Stale or incorrect answers: mitigate by frequent reindexing and content versioning.
• Privacy and IP exposure: never index PII or sensitive IP without encryption, role-based access, and auditing.
• Hallucinated citations: enforce a “source_required” rule and validate citations against the index.
• Cost overruns: optimize by caching commonly used contexts, batching queries, and using smaller models for retrieval tasks.

High-value enterprise use cases

• Sales enablement: evidence-backed product comparisons and quoting guidance.
• Customer support: first-response automation that cites KB articles and escalates when required.
• Engineering knowledge: searchable design decisions, runbooks, and architecture notes.
• Compliance and audit: traceable answers linked to policy documents and evidence.

Metrics that matter

Measure accuracy (user-verified correctness), time-to-answer reduction, citation quality (authoritativeness of sources), user satisfaction, and escalation rate to humans. Use these to iterate on retrieval parameters, prompt rules, and content curation.

Example prompt template

“You are an assistant that must use only the provided sources. Answer concisely and cite the sources used. If the sources do not support an answer, respond: ‘I don’t know — consult [recommended source]’.”

Conclusion

RAG converts LLM fluency into enterprise-grade reliability by forcing answers to be evidence‑based, auditable, and applicable. It’s the practical pattern for organizations that need fast, helpful automation without fiction — think of it as giving your model a librarian and a bibliography.

Salesforce Marketing Cloud + AI is revolutionizing marketing by combining advanced artificial intelligence with marketing automation to create hyper-personalized, data-driven campaigns that adapt in real time to customer behaviors and preferences. This fusion drives engagement, conversions, and revenue growth like never before.

Key AI Features of Salesforce Marketing Cloud

• Agentforce: An autonomous AI agent that helps marketers create dynamic, scalable campaigns with effortless automation and real-time optimization. It streamlines content creation, segmentation, and journey management through simple prompts and AI insights. Learn more at the Salesforce official site.

• Einstein AI: Powers predictive analytics, customized content generation, send-time optimization, and smart audience segmentation, ensuring the right message reaches the right customer at the optimal time.

• Generative AI: Using Einstein GPT, marketers can automatically generate email copy, subject lines, images, and landing pages, enhancing productivity while maintaining brand consistency.

• Marketing Cloud Personalization: Provides real-time behavioral data and AI-driven recommendations to deliver tailored experiences that boost customer loyalty and conversion rates.

• Unified Data Cloud Integration: Seamlessly connects live customer data for dynamic segmentation and activation, eliminating data silos.

• Multi-Channel Orchestration: Integrates deeply with platforms like WhatsApp, Slack, and LinkedIn to deliver personalized campaigns across all customer touchpoints.

Latest Trends & 2025 Updates

• With advanced artificial intelligence, marketing teams benefit from systems that independently manage and adjust their campaigns for optimal results.

• Real-time customer journey adaptations powered by live data.

• Enhanced collaboration via AI integration with Slack and other platforms.

• Automated paid media optimization and budget control with minimal manual intervention.

For detailed insights on AI and marketing automation trends, see this industry report.

Benefits of Combining Salesforce Marketing Cloud + AI

• Increased campaign efficiency and ROI through automation and predictive analytics.

• Hyper-personalized customer engagement at scale.

• Reduced manual effort with AI-assisted content and segmentation.

• Better decision-making powered by unified data and AI-driven insights.

• Greater marketing agility and responsiveness in a changing landscape.

Related Posts

• • Mastering Customer Journey Mapping with Salesforce

  • Top AI Tools for Marketing in 2025

“Powerful technologies require equally powerful ethical guidance.” (Bostrom, N. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford University Press, 2014).

The ethics of using artificial intelligence depend on how we apply its capabilities—either to enhance learning or to prevent irresponsible practices that may compromise academic integrity. In this blog, I share reflections, experiences, and insights about the impact of AI in our environment, analyzing its role as a creative tool in the hands of developers and as a challenge within the academic context.

Between industry and the classroom

As a Senior Developer, my professional trajectory has led me to delve deeply into the fascinating discipline of software architecture. Currently, I work as a Backend Developer specializing in Microsoft technologies, facing daily the challenges of building robust, scalable, and well-structured systems in the business world.

Alongside my role in the industry, I am privileged to serve as a university professor, teaching four courses. Three of them are fundamental parts of the software development lifecycle: Software Analysis and Design, Software Architecture, and Programming Techniques. This dual perspective—as both a professional and a teacher—has allowed me to observe the rapid changes that technology is generating both in daily development practice and in the formation of future engineers.

Exploring AI as an Accelerator in Software Development

One of the greatest challenges for those studying the software development lifecycle is transforming ideas and diagrams into functional, well-structured projects. I always encourage my students to use Artificial Intelligence as a tool for acceleration, not as a substitute.

For example, in the Software Analysis and Design course, we demonstrate how a BPMN 2.0 process diagram can serve as a starting point for modeling a system. We also work with class diagrams that reflect compositions and various design patterns. AI can intervene in this process in several ways:

• Code Generation from Models: With AI-based tools, it’s possible to automatically turn a well-built class diagram into the source code foundation needed to start a project, respecting the relationships and patterns defined during modeling.
• Rapid Project Architecture Setup: Using AI assistants, we can streamline the initial setup of a project by selecting the technology stack, creating folder structures, base files, and configurations according to best practices.
• Early Validation and Correction: AI can suggest improvements to proposed models, detect inconsistencies, foresee integration issues, and help adapt the design context even before coding begins.

This approach allows students to dedicate more time to understanding the logic behind each component and design principle, instead of spending hours on repetitive setup and basic coding tasks. The conscious and critical use of artificial intelligence strengthens their learning, provides them with more time to innovate, and helps prepare them for real-world industry challenges.

But Not Everything Is Perfect: The Challenges in Programming Techniques

However, not everything is as positive as it seems. In “Programming Techniques,” a course that represents students’ first real contact with application development, the impact of AI is different compared to more advanced subjects. In the past, the repetitive process of writing code—such as creating a simple constructor public Person(), a function public void printFullName() or practicing encapsulation in Java with methods like public void setName(String name) and public String getName()—kept the fundamental programming concepts fresh and clear while coding.

This repetition was not just mechanical; it reinforced their understanding of concepts like object construction, data encapsulation, and procedural logic. It also played a crucial role in developing a solid foundation that made it easier to understand more complex topics, such as design patterns, in future courses.

Nowadays, with the widespread availability and use of AI-based tools and code generators, students tend to skip these fundamental steps. Instead of internalizing these concepts through practice, they quickly generate code snippets without fully understanding their structure or purpose. As a result, the pillars of programming—such as abstraction, encapsulation, inheritance, and polymorphism—are not deeply absorbed, which can lead to confusion and mistakes later on.

Although AI offers the promise of accelerating development and reducing manual labor, it is important to remember that certain repetition and manual coding are essential for establishing a solid understanding of fundamental principles. Without this foundation, it becomes difficult for students to recognize bad practices, avoid common errors, and truly appreciate the architecture and design of robust software systems.

Reflection and Ethical Challenges in Using AI

Recently, I explained the concept of reflection in microservices to my Software Architecture students. To illustrate this, I used the following example: when implementing the Abstract Factory design pattern within a microservices architecture, the Reflection technique can be used to dynamically instantiate concrete classes at runtime. This allows the factory to decide which object to create based on external parameters, such as a message type or specific configuration received from another service. I consider this concept fundamental if we aim to design an architecture suitable for business models that require this level of flexibility.

However, during a classroom exercise where I provided a base code, I asked the students to correct an error that I had deliberately injected. The error consisted of an additional parameter in a constructor—a detail that did not cause compilation failures, but at runtime, it caused 2 out of 5 microservices that consumed the abstract factory via reflection to fail. From their perspective, this exercise may have seemed unnecessary, which led many to ask AI to fix the error.

As expected, the AI efficiently eliminated the error but overlooked a fundamental acceptance criterion: that parameter was necessary for the correct functioning of the solution. The task was not to remove the parameter but to add it in the Factory classes where it was missing. Out of 36 students, only 3 were able to explain and justify the changes they made. The rest did not even know what modifications the AI had implemented.

This experience highlights the double-edged nature of artificial intelligence in learning: it can provide quick solutions, but if the context or the criteria behind a problem are not understood, the correction can be superficial and jeopardize both the quality and the deep understanding of the code.

I haven’t limited this exercise to architecture examples alone. I have also conducted mock interviews, asking basic programming concepts. Surprisingly, even among final-year students who are already doing their internships, the success rate is alarmingly low: approximately 65% to 70% of the questions are answered incorrectly, which would automatically disqualify them in a real technical interview.

Conclusion

Artificial intelligence has become increasingly integrated into academia, yet its use does not always reflect a genuine desire to learn. For many students, AI has turned into a tool for simply getting through academic commitments, rather than an ally that fosters knowledge, creativity, and critical thinking. This trend presents clear risks: a loss of deep understanding, unreflective automation of tasks, and a lack of internalization of fundamental concepts—all crucial for professional growth in technological fields.

Various authors have analyzed the impact of AI on educational processes and emphasize the importance of promoting its ethical and constructive use. As Luckin et al. (2016) suggest, the key lies in integrating artificial intelligence as support for skill development rather than as a shortcut to avoid intellectual effort. Similarly, Selwyn (2019) explores the ethical and pedagogical challenges that arise when technology becomes a quick fix instead of a resource for deep learning.

References:

• Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education. Pearson Education. [Available at: https://www.pearson.com/content/dam/one-dot-com/one-dot-com/global/Files/about-pearson/innovation/open-ideas/Intelligence-Unleashed-Publication.pdf]
• Selwyn, N. (2019). Should Robots Replace Teachers? AI and the Future of Education. Polity Press.

Financial institutions are at a pivotal moment. As customer expectations evolve and AI reshapes digital engagement, leaders in marketing, CX, and IT must rethink how they deliver value.

Adobe’s report, “State of Customer Experience in Financial Services in an AI-Driven World,” reveals that only 36% of the customer journey is currently personalized, despite 74% of executives acknowledging rising customer expectations. With transformation already underway, financial leaders face five imperatives that demand immediate action to drive relevance, trust, and growth.

1. Make Personalization More Meaningful

Personalization has long been a strategic focus, but today’s consumers expect more than basic segmentation or name-based greetings. They want real-time, omnichannel interactions that align with their financial goals, life stages, and behaviors.

To meet this demand, financial institutions must evolve from reactive personalization to predictive, intent-driven engagement. This means leveraging AI to anticipate needs, orchestrate journeys, and deliver content that resonates with individual context.

Perficient Adobe-consulting principal Ross Monaghan explains, “We are still dealing with disparate data and slow progression into a customer 360 source of truth view to provide effective personalization at scale. What many firms are overlooking is that this isn’t just a data issue. We’re dealing with both a people and process issue where teams need to adjust their operational process of typical campaign waterfall execution to trigger-based and journey personalization.”

His point underscores that personalization challenges go beyond technology. They require cultural and operational shifts to enable real-time, AI-driven engagement.

2. Redesign the Operating Model Around the Customer

Legacy structures often silo marketing, IT, and operations, creating friction in delivering cohesive customer experiences. To compete in a digital-first world, financial institutions must reorient their operating models around the customer, not the org chart.

This shift requires cross-functional collaboration, agile workflows, and shared KPIs that align teams around customer outcomes. It also demands a culture that embraces experimentation and continuous improvement.

Only 3% of financial services firms are structured around the customer journey, though 19% say it should be the ideal.

3. Build Content for AI-Powered Search

As AI-powered search becomes a primary interface for information discovery, the way content is created and structured must change. Traditional SEO strategies are no longer enough.

Customers now expect intelligent, personalized answers over static search results. To stay visible and trusted, financial institutions must create structured, metadata-rich content that performs in AI-powered environments. Content must reflect experience-expertise-authoritativeness-trustworthiness principles and be both machine-readable and human-relevant. Success depends on building discovery journeys that work across AI interfaces while earning customer confidence in moments that matter.

4. Unify Data and Platforms for Scalable Intelligence

Disconnected data and fragmented platforms limit the ability to generate insights and act on them at scale. To unlock the full potential of AI and automation, financial institutions must unify their data ecosystems.

This means integrating customer, behavioral, transactional, and operational data into a single source of truth that’s accessible across teams and systems. It also involves modernizing MarTech and CX platforms to support real-time decisioning and personalization.

But Ross points out, “Many digital experience and marketing platforms still want to own all data, which is just not realistic, both in reality and cost. The firms that develop their customer source of truth (typically cloud-based data platforms) and signal to other experience or service platforms will be the quickest to marketing execution maturity and success.”

His insight emphasizes that success depends not only on technology integration but also on adopting a federated approach that accelerates marketing execution and operational maturity.

5. Embed Guardrails Into GenAI Execution

As financial institutions explore GenAI use cases, from content generation to customer service automation, governance must be built in from the start. Trust is non-negotiable in financial services, and GenAI introduces new risks around accuracy, bias, and compliance.

Embedding guardrails means establishing clear policies, human-in-the-loop review processes, and robust monitoring systems. It also requires collaboration between legal, compliance, marketing, and IT to ensure responsible innovation.

At Perficient, we use our PACE (Policies, Advocacy, Controls, Enablement) Framework to holistically design tailored operational AI programs that empower business and technical stakeholders to innovate with confidence while mitigating risks and upholding ethical standards.

The Time to Lead is Now

The future of financial services will be defined by how intelligently and responsibly institutions engage in real time. These five imperatives offer a blueprint for action, each one grounded in data, urgency, and opportunity. Leaders who move now will be best positioned to earn trust, drive growth, and lead in the AI-powered era.

Learn About Perficient and Adobe’s Partnership

Are you looking for a partner to help you transform and modernize your technology strategy? Perficient and Adobe bring together deep industry expertise and powerful experience technologies to help financial institutions unify data, orchestrate journeys, and deliver customer-centric experiences that build trust and drive growth.

Get in Touch With Our Experts

I think about the early ATMs now and then. No one knew the “right” way to use them. I imagine a customer in the 1970s standing there, card in hand, squinting at this unfamiliar machine and hoping it would give something back; trying to decide if it really dispensed cash…or just ate cards for sport. That quick panic when the machine pulled the card in is an early version of the same confusion customers feel today in digital banking.

People were not afraid of machines. They were afraid of not understanding what the machine was doing with their money.

Banks solved it by teaching people how to trust the process. They added clear instructions, trained staff to guide customers, and repeated the same steps until the unfamiliar felt intuitive. 

However, the stakes and complexity are much higher now, and AI for financial product transparency is becoming essential to an optimized banking UX.

Today’s banking customer must navigate automated underwriting, digital identity checks, algorithmic risk models, hybrid blockchain components, and disclosures written in a language most people never use. Meanwhile, the average person is still struggling with basic money concepts.

FINRA reports that only 37% of U.S. adults can answer four out of five financial literacy questions (FINRA Foundation, 2022).

Pew Research finds that only about half of Americans understand key concepts like inflation and interest (Pew Research Center, 2024).

Financial institutions are starting to realize that clarity is not a content task or a customer service perk. It is structural. It affects conversion, compliance, risk, and trust. It shapes the entire digital experience. And AI is accelerating the pressure to treat clarity as infrastructure.

When customers don’t understand, they don’t convert. When they feel unsure, they abandon the flow. 

How AI is Improving UX in Banking (And Why Institutions Need it Now)

Financial institutions often assume customers will “figure it out.” They will Google a term, reread a disclosure, or call support if something is unclear. In reality, most customers simply exit the flow.

The CFPB shows that lower financial literacy leads to more mistakes, higher confusion, and weaker decision-making (CFPB, 2019). And when that confusion arises during a digital journey, customers quietly leave without resolving their questions.

This means every abandoned application costs money. Every misinterpreted term creates operational drag. Every unclear disclosure becomes a compliance liability. Institutions consistently point to misunderstanding as a major driver of complaints, errors, and churn (Lusardi et al., 2020).

Sometimes it feels like the industry built the digital bank faster than it built the explanation for it.

Where AI Makes the Difference

Many discussions about AI in financial services focus on automation or chatbots, but the real opportunity lies in real-time clarity. Clarity that improves financial product transparency and streamlines customer experience without creating extra steps.

In-context Explanations That Improve Understanding

Research in educational psychology shows people learn best when information appears the moment they need it. Mayer (2019) demonstrates that in-context explanations significantly boost comprehension. Instead of leaving the app to search unfamiliar terms, customers receive a clear, human explanation on the spot.

Consistency Across Channels

Language in banking is surprisingly inconsistent. Apps, websites, advisors, and support teams all use slightly different terms. Capgemini identifies cross-channel inconsistency as a major cause of digital frustration (Capgemini, 2023). A unified AI knowledge layer solves this by standardizing definitions across the system.

Predictive Clarity Powered by Behavioral Insight

Patterns like hesitation, backtracking, rapid clicking, or form abandonment often signal confusion. Behavioral economists note these patterns can predict drop-off before it happens (Loibl et al., 2021). AI can flag these friction points and help institutions fix them.

24/7 Clarity, Not 9–5 Support

Accenture reports that most digital banking interactions now occur outside of business hours (Accenture, 2023). AI allows institutions to provide accurate, transparent explanations anytime, without relying solely on support teams.

At its core, AI doesn’t simplify financial products. It translates them.

What Strong AI-Powered Customer Experience Looks Like

Onboarding that Explains Itself

• Mortgage flows with one-sentence escrow definitions.
• Credit card applications with visual explanations of usage.
  
• Hybrid products that show exactly what blockchain is doing behind the scenes. The CFPB shows that simpler, clearer formats directly improve decision quality (CFPB, 2020).

A Unified Dictionary Across Channels

The Federal Reserve emphasizes the importance of consistent terminology to help consumers make informed decisions (Federal Reserve Board, 2021). Some institutions now maintain a centralized term library that powers their entire ecosystem, creating a cohesive experience instead of fragmented messaging.

Personalization Based on User Behavior

Educational nudges, simplified paths, multilingual explanations. Research shows these interventions boost customer confidence (Kozup & Hogarth, 2008). 

Transparent Explanations for Hybrid or Blockchain-backed Products

Customers adopt new technology faster when they understand the mechanics behind it (University of Cambridge, 2021). AI can make complex automation and decentralized components understandable.

The Urgent Responsibilities That Come With This

GenAI can mislead customers without strong data governance and oversight. Poor training data, inconsistent terminology, or unmonitored AI systems create clarity gaps. That’s a problem because those gaps can become compliance issues. The Financial Stability Oversight Council warns that unmanaged AI introduces systemic risk (FSOC, 2023). The CFPB also emphasizes the need for compliant, accurate AI-generated content (CFPB, 2024).

Customers are also increasingly wary of data usage and privacy. Pew Research shows growing fear around how financial institutions use personal data (Pew Research Center, 2023). Trust requires transparency.

Clarity without governance is not clarity. It’s noise.

And institutions cannot afford noise.

What Institutions Should Build Right Now

To make clarity foundational to customer experience, financial institutions need to invest in:

• Modern data pipelines to improve accuracy
• Consistent terminology and UX layers across channels
• Responsible AI frameworks with human oversight
• Cross-functional collaboration between compliance, design, product, and analytics
• Scalable architecture for automated and decentralized product components
• Human-plus-AI support models that enhance, not replace, advisors

When clarity becomes structural, trust becomes scalable.

Why This Moment Matters

I keep coming back to the ATM because it perfectly shows what happens when technology outruns customer understanding. The machine wasn’t the problem. The knowledge gap was. Financial services are reliving that moment today.

Customers cannot trust what they do not understand.

And institutions cannot scale what customers do not trust.

GenAI gives financial organizations a second chance to rebuild the clarity layer the industry has lacked for decades, and not as marketing. Clarity, in this new landscape, truly is infrastructure.

Related Reading

• The Personalization Gap Is Hurting Financial Services, Here’s How to Close It: A discussion of how personalization shortfalls are holding back financial services from meeting customer expectations. 

• Closing the Gap Between Expectations and Experience in Financial Services: Analysis of rising customer expectations and why legacy systems struggle to keep up. 

• Trust Is the New Currency in Financial Services and Customers Are Setting the Terms: A look at how trust, speed, transparency, and control are reshaping what customers expect from their institutions. 

References 

• Accenture. (2023). Banking top trends 2023. https://www.accenture.com
• Capgemini. (2023). World retail banking report 2023. https://www.capgemini.com
• Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. (2019). Financial well-being in America. https://www.consumerfinance.gov
• Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. (2020). Improving the clarity of mortgage disclosures. https://www.consumerfinance.gov
• Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. (2024). Supervisory highlights: Issue 30. https://www.consumerfinance.gov
• Federal Reserve Board. (2021). Consumers and mobile financial services. https://www.federalreserve.gov
• FINRA Investor Education Foundation. (2022). National financial capability study. https://www.finrafoundation.org
• Financial Stability Oversight Council. (2023). Annual report. https://home.treasury.gov
• Kozup, J., & Hogarth, J. (2008). Financial literacy, public policy, and consumers’ self-protection. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 42(2), 263–270.
• Loibl, C., Grinstein-Weiss, M., & Koeninger, J. (2021). Consumer financial behavior in digital environments. Journal of Economic Psychology, 87, 102438.
• Lusardi, A., Mitchell, O. S., & Oggero, N. (2020). The changing face of financial literacy. University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School.
• Mayer, R. (2019). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.
• Pew Research Center. (2023). Americans and data privacy. https://www.pewresearch.org
• Pew Research Center. (2024). Americans and financial knowledge. https://www.pewresearch.org
• University of Cambridge. (2021). Global blockchain benchmarking study. https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk

Feature	Minimax M2	GPT-4.1	Claude Sonnet 4.5
Architecture	Mixture of Experts (MoE)	Dense Transformer	Dense Transformer
Total Parameters	230 Billion	~1.7 Trillion (estimated)	Undisclosed
Active Parameters	10 Billion	~1.7 Trillion	Undisclosed
Context Window	128K tokens	128K tokens	200K tokens
Input Pricing	$0.30 / 1M tokens	$3.00 / 1M tokens	$3.00 / 1M tokens
Output Pricing	$1.20 / 1M tokens	$12.00 / 1M tokens	$15.00 / 1M tokens
Inference Speed	~100 tokens/second	~60 tokens/second	~50 tokens/second
Open Source	Yes (Apache 2.0)	No	No
Self-Hosting	Available	Not available	Not available
Interleaved Reasoning	Native support	No	No
Best Use Cases	Agentic workflows, coding	General purpose, reasoning	Coding, analysis, creative

Cross-posted from www.linkedin.com/in/matthew-aberham

The Evolution of Microsoft Copilot

• Copilots journey starts from the time when Microsoft developed Cortana – a digital assistant to support Windows. But over time, AI has evolved and Microsoft began to adapt advanced features of AI, harnessing all the necessary features to be put on. Moreover, with the development of text summarization and Generative AI, and after the arrival of large language models like GPT, Copilot starts getting its new shape.
• Microsoft finally announced early versions of Copilot in 2023, which seamlessly work across Microsoft 365 apps. Its integration with Microsoft Graph API allows us to provide real-time context awareness, making a significant leap in how AI can be utilized for everyday work tasks.

As Microsoft Copilot

• Microsoft Copilot is an AI assistant like ChatGPT, but not exactly like ChatGPT! It’s far better at handling complex queries, but only a few people know how to use it efficiently.
• It holds the power to give you real-time strategies and productivity, unlike any other AI assistant. The Copilot System operates with Microsoft 365 and it uses Large Language Models (LLMs) and other Machine Learning models to process data.
• Microsoft Copilot leverages Generative AI to provide real-time automation. A user is highly important for any AI assistant because it requires some input from the user at a time.
• The best thing is that Copilot learns constantly and adapts to your unique workflow, your particular patterns or behaviors, daily work schedule, task management, preferences, and personalization, making it your personal assistant and increasingly more useful over time.

Microsoft Copilot in the Workplace

• Today, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is going crazy and we find it in each and every tech field, conquering its dominance in the IT market.
• No matter how different the field of work is, AI will find itself to fit in, making the task easy for the people using it.
• And whats better than having an AI assistant that keeps track of all your tasks along with making all the work very easy? One of the standout AI innovations nowadays is the Microsoft Copilot.
• Considered as one of the biggest game-changing productivity tools, which is specially made to be integrated with Microsoft 365 apps like Word, Docs, PowerPoint, Excel, and Microsoft Teams.
• Microsoft Copilot will work for you whether you are drafting multiple professional emails, or creating a powerful presentation with selective themes of your choice in PowerPoint.
• And yes, some of those repetitive tasks deserve to be done on time with less effort. Hence those tedious repetitive tasks shall be handled by Copilot and you can just focus on becoming more creative without worrying about long tedious work.

Features

Microsoft Copilot gives you ample features that boost your productivity and level up your content generation. Some of the main features of Microsoft Copilot are mentioned below −

AI-Powered Writing

Microsoft Copilot helps to write your content, not any simple content but AI-powered generative content that looks more fascinating and interesting to read. This assistant is specially used in Microsoft Word and generates content based on your summary or prompt given. Whether you want to draft a report, email, proposal, grammar check or even story writing, etc. anything can be done at ease.

Data Analysis and Visualization

Data analysis is a highly professional task for the people dealing with data in this field. Microsoft Copilot helps them to structure and arrange data in Microsoft Excel, increasing overall capacity by generating charts, calculations, data patterns, insights based on data, etc. Providing whole automation throughout your data handling, monitoring, and analyzing task.

Improved Presentation

The presentation assistance of Copilot in PowerPoint helps you to get access to direct templates which are both stunning and easy to use in your next presentation. It suggests side layouts, designs, and visual elements and offers various ideas to make your presentation highly professional.

Improved Collaboration in Microsoft Teams

Copilot helps to summarize conversations in the meetings, generating action points and flagging important topics to be discussed on. And also allows more effective communication by suggesting responses to live chats.

Natural Language Interaction

Copilot has the ability to understand the local language so that it can be highly user-friendly and always accessible to non-tech people.

Benefits of Using Microsoft Copilot

There are a lot of benefits of using Microsoft copilot which are mentioned below.

• Increased Productivity
• Streamlined Workflows
• Customisable Assistance
• Better Collaboration
• Real-time Learning
• Real-Time Data Analysis
• Time-Saving Formula Generation
• Email Management
• Cross-APplication Functionality
• Learning and Adapting Over Time
• Microsoft Graph API
• Increased Productivity
• Improved Security

We have seen Microsoft Copilot as a highly professional productivity tool that uses Large Language Models (LLM), integrating data with all the Microsoft 365 apps, and yes that’s why we do not want to miss any of the features of Microsoft’s powerful AI.

With this step-by-step guide, we will see the process of using Microsoft Copilot, starting from accessing it at the basic level and advancing it for maximum productivity.

In speaking recently with my current co-worker Amanda Estiverne-Colas, who serves as Director and Head of Payments Practice at Perficient, Amanda shared with me statistics she had provided to her audience at the 2025 GULF AML Forum, an annual conference for anti-money laundering (AML) professionals in the financial services industry and government. The statistics, which I found both fascinating and scary, included: 

• Phishing attacks have surged by 4,151% just since ChatGPT’s launch in 2022 

• Phone Phishing attacks increased by 28% in Q3 2024, while smishing incidents rose by 22% 

• More than half (53%) of all breaches involve customer PII, which can include tax identification numbers, emails, phone numbers, and home addresses 

For the clarity of readers, phishing is the fraudulent practice of sending email messages purporting to be from reputable companies in order to induce individuals to reveal personal information, such as passwords or credit card numbers, and smishing is the fraudulent practice of sending text messages purporting to be from reputable companies in order to induce individuals to reveal personal information, such as passwords or credit card numbers. 

In our hyper-connected world, digital transactions occur at lightning speed, creating a vast and complex landscape for financial crime. While artificial intelligence and machine learning tools are vital in the fight against fraud, the human element remains the cornerstone of effective defense. Fraud detection isn’t just about algorithms; it’s about the people behind the screens—the victims, the fraudsters, the analysts, and the developers. 

As I spoke with Amanda about how financial institutions and consumers can fight against burgeoning fraud, I was reminded of the teaching of a former co-worker from much earlier in my career. Having just finished serving in the army, that co-worker highlighted the motto of the Seven Ps. Those Ps being “Proper Prior Planning Prevents Piss-Poor Performance”. The current, and with all-due respect to the members of our armed forces, better-etiquette, saying is limited to the Four Ps—Protect, Prepare, Pursue, and Prevent. Using this, readers can gain a holistic understanding of how more resilient, human-centric systems can be designed and built to combat fraud. 

Protect: Safeguarding More Than Just Data 

Protection is the primary line of defense, extending beyond a company’s balance sheet to its reputation, customer trust, and employee well-being. In the digital age, this means creating safeguards that are both technologically advanced and human aware. 

The human side of protection involves recognizing that the primary target of many modern fraud schemes is not system vulnerability, but human psychology. Social engineering preys on trust, fear, and urgency. As such, the most crucial protective measure becomes continuous human training and awareness. Staff must be educated in the latest social engineering tactics, red flags in communication, and subtle behavioral changes that might indicate internal fraud, such as an employee living beyond their means or refusing to share job duties. 

Furthermore, dealing with victims of fraud requires a distinct human touch. A customer who has lost their life savings to an online scam needs empathy and clear, supportive guidance, not automated responses. Human analysts serve as the compassionate front line, helping victims navigate a distressing experience and rebuild trust in the institution. 

Prepare: Cultivating Resilience and Expertise 

Preparation means anticipating complexity and ambiguity, as fraudsters constantly adapt their methods. Technology helps, but it is the trained professional who must handle the unexpected. 

A significant human challenge in this phase is managing “alert fatigue”. Advanced fraud detection systems generate high volumes of alerts, many of which are false positives (legitimate transactions incorrectly flagged as fraud). Analysts, overwhelmed by the sheer volume, may become desensitized to actual threats. This is where human expertise and critical thinking are indispensable. Experienced analysts provide essential feedback on the utility of detection models, helping to tune systems to be more accurate and reduce false positives. 

Preparation also involves developing professional resilience. Investigators deal with angry victims and deceptive individuals, requiring emotional intelligence and clear communication skills. The human element in preparation ensures that institutions are not just structurally ready with protocols but also staffed with people who are mentally and skillfully equipped to handle high-stress situations. 

Pursue: The Art of Human Investigation 

When fraud occurs, the pursuit begins. While data analytics help “follow the money,” human investigators are the ones who put the pieces together, often leveraging a combination of technical knowledge and investigative experience. 

Transactions in a digital landscape rarely move in straight lines. Criminals use layering, cross-jurisdictional transfers, and digital assets to obscure the path. Pursuing these requires human ingenuity to connect seemingly unrelated data points and understand the “why” behind the transactions. 

Crucially, pursuit relies heavily on inter-institutional and human collaboration. Sharing information between banks and agencies, often hampered by misinterpretations of privacy laws, is a human-led effort to overcome organizational silos. Human networks and trusted relationships between compliance professionals are essential to disrupt criminal activity effectively. 

Prevent: The Continuous Cycle of Learning 

Prevention is about learning from every case and educating both consumers and staff to stop future occurrences. 

Starting with an all-digital approach, one bank that worked with Amanda and her team initiated real-time transaction notifications requiring instant customer verification, to help prevent fraud. Another financial institution worked with Perficient to modify their in-app fraud education library updated weekly with new threats. AI-powered analysis of customer transaction patterns triggers proactive educational interventions before fraud occurs.  

This final P is not just all-digital but also brings us back to the human element as the loop-closer in the system. Every investigation offers insights into new fraud typologies, compromised onboarding flows, or novel social engineering tactics. It is up to human teams—investigators, risk managers, and product developers—to establish effective feedback loops. 

The human side of prevention is fostering a culture where fraud is not a siloed responsibility but a part of the organization’s DNA. It involves embedding “compliance by design” into new digital products, ensuring that human-centric insights are used to make systems inherently more secure. 

Conclusion: 

Ultimately, the digital age has made fraud detection faster and more data-intensive, but the core battle remains human versus human—the fraudsters’ psychology against the collective ingenuity and integrity of those dedicated to stopping them. By embracing the Four Ps of Protect, Prepare, Pursue, and Prevent, Perficient can combine their AI expertise with technical and compliance staff and ensure that both human and artificial intelligence are combined successfully at the heart of your firm’s defensive strategies against fraud.  

Our financial services experts continuously monitor the financial services landscape and deliver pragmatic, scalable solutions that meet the required mandate and more. Reach out to Perficient’s Director and Head of Payments Practice Amanda Estiverne-Colas to discover why we’ve been trusted by 18 of the top 20 banks, 16 of the 20 largest wealth and asset management firms, and 25+ leading payment + card processing companies and are regularly recognized by leading analyst firms. 

In financial services, trust has always been foundational. But today, it’s being redefined, not by brand reputation or policy language, but by how customers experience speed, control, and transparency in real time. 

According to Adobe’s report, “State of Customer Experience in Financial Services in an AI-Driven World,” 96% of financial services executives say customers value privacy and data protection, and 63% say they expect transparent pricing. These have become operational expectations, and they’re shaping how trust is built moment by moment.

Trust Is Built in the Details Customers Can See

A face-ID login. A real-time transaction alert. A personalized financial nudge. These micro-moments now carry more weight than any static privacy policy. Customers judge trustworthiness by how responsive and secure their digital experiences feel—especially when managing sensitive tasks like wire transfers, credit approvals, or investment decisions. 

In this new landscape, trust is engineered, not assumed. 

Designing for Trust Means Designing for the Customer

Customers today expect more than digital convenience. They want to feel in control of their money, identity, and digital footprint and engage with institutions that respect their time, values, and privacy. Trust is no longer built solely through face-to-face interactions or legacy brand reputation. Trust is earned through every digital touchpoint.

To meet these expectations, financial institutions must deliver on three critical fronts:

1. Mobile-First Journeys With Instant Authentication

Customers expect secure access anytime, anywhere. A mobile-first design can enable frictionless, secure interactions that reinforce a sense of control and safety. Biometric authentication, real-time alerts, and intuitive navigation all contribute to a trustworthy experience.

2. Personalized Recommendations That Reflect Their Financial Goals

Trust grows when customers feel understood. Using AI and data responsibly to deliver tailored insights, whether it’s budgeting tips, investment opportunities, or credit alerts, shows that the institution is aligned with the customer’s financial well-being. Transparency in how data is used is key to maintaining that trust.

3. Seamless, Omnichannel Experiences That Feel Consistent and Secure

Whether a customer is engaging via app, website, call center, or in-branch, the experience should feel unified and secure. Consistency in branding, messaging, and service quality reinforces reliability, while secure data handling across channels ensures peace of mind.

Institutions that fail to deliver these experiences risk losing not just attention but loyalty. In a competitive landscape where switching providers is easier than ever, trust becomes a differentiator and a strategic imperative.

From Compliance Output to Design Input

Trust has become a core design principle. Instead of treating it as the outcome of compliance, financial institutions are embedding it into the very fabric of the customer experience. This shift reflects a broader understanding: trust is emotional, experiential, and earned in moments, not just mandated in policies.

That means:

Aligning products, security, and experience teams.

Trustworthy experiences require collaboration across silos. When product managers, cybersecurity experts, and UX designers work together, they can create solutions that are not only secure but also intuitive and empathetic. This alignment ensures that security features enhance, not hinder, the user experience.

Ensuring Personalization respects boundaries and data use is clearly communicated.

Customers want tailored experiences, but also want to know their data is safe. Leading institutions are adopting privacy-by-design principles, making it easy for users to understand how their data is used and giving them control over personalization settings. Transparency builds confidence; ambiguity erodes it.

Embedding transparency and predictability into every screen and interaction.

From clear language in disclosures to consistent UI patterns, every detail matters. Predictable flows, upfront information, and visible security cues (like encryption badges or session timers) help users feel safe and informed. These micro-moments of clarity add up to a macro-impact on trust.

This evolution requires cross-functional collaboration and a deep understanding of customer expectations.

Ready to Build Trust Through Experience Design?

Download the full Adobe report to explore the top 10 insights shaping the future of financial services, and discover how your organization can lead with intelligence, responsibility, and trust.

Learn About Perficient and Adobe’s Partnership

Perficient and Adobe bring together deep industry expertise and powerful experience technologies to help financial services organizations unify data, orchestrate journeys, and deliver customer-centric experiences that build trust and drive growth.

Get in Touch With Our Experts