Perficient Healtchare Solutions Blog

Subscribe via Email

Subscribe to RSS feed

Archives

Archive for the ‘Collaboration’ Category

Includes Provider Portals (Patient, Provider, Physician), Payor Portals (member, provider, agents/brokers), and User Experience

Participatory Medicine Meets Participatory Design

Most times when the word “participatory” enters my lexicon it is closely followed by the word “medicine”.  I’m a fan of participatory medicine.  If you don’t believe me, then you can look here, or here, or here for written proof.

Participatory medicine is a care model in where the role of the patient is active, enabled, and emphasized.  Participatory medicine requires the “mindful” inclusion of the patient in the care delivery process.  When you see online patient communities forming, then you see participatory medicine at work.  You will also witness shared decision making, patient participation on the treatment team, and evidence based patient choice.  The director of the U.S. National Institutes of Health has been quoted as saying:

As opposed to the doctor-centric, curative model of the past, the future is going to be patient-centric and proactive. It must be based on education and communication.

These are the types of sentiments that make someone like me very happy.  The fact that I get to play a role, even though quite small, in this movement is the kind of intrinsic motivator that gets me up each day happy to do my work in Connected Health.

hands-raised-participateIn Connected Health we design technologies meant for patient engagement.  They are the communication lines that extend outside of the eight minute patient visit and into the lives of patients wherever they are when healthful decision making counts.  As a result, another participatory term set is beginning to exit my mouth more frequently.  That is, namely, participatory design.  Participatory design, also known as cooperative design, emphasizes active inclusion of all stakeholders, even those that do not know how to use Photoshop, in the design process.  Key to this end is the end user.  In our case that means the patient.  By using participatory design, we are able to create environments that are more responsive and appropriate to a patient’s cultural, emotional, spiritual and practical needs. User empowerment is built into the core of this process.

So, what if patients were crowd-sourced more regularly to solve all of those challenging patient engagement issues?  For example, many of the biggest challenges I see on provider websites occur because it is challenging for an employee of a health system, the ones actually making the final decisions, to release their mind from the confines of their day job.  This usually means that the content of the public website is architected in the way that employees see the organization: by department or facility.  Problem is, this gets in the way of patients trying to find the information they need to be more healthful.  Patients shouldn’t have to navigate 5 layers deep to find content specific to their condition or health concern.  Patients won’t work that hard.  Instead, the hub of digital patient engagement should have, at its core, the patient user experience.

Not being new to the public website creation rodeo, I’ve found the process and final product to be greatly improved through the addition of patient voices throughout the entire website design process.  I’ve never met two patient populations that are the same, so while there is general advice on tailoring a message to patient needs, insight should always be collected from the target market in question.  This insight informs the nuts and bolts of information architecture and the engagement of graphic design.

As a result, a one and done approach to patient feedback is good.  An iterative approach to patient feedback on site design is better.  Co-designing a site with patients?  I would love to see that on every provider website.  By using participatory design to reach out to patients in the beginning of the relationship, with the website that engenders a culture of participation, then it makes it that much easier for that participation to be embedded throughout the entire collaborative care model.

Improving Patient Experience – Not Just for Inpatient Settings

Medicare is basing hospital reimbursements on performance measures. Patient satisfaction determines 30% of the incentive payments, and improved clinical outcomes decide 70 percent (source). So, it is no surprise that the term “patient experience” is rolling off people’s tongues very matter-of-fact like. 

With the focus primarily on the hospital or inpatient setting, it’s easy to forget about the ambulatory or outpatient setting when it comes to patient experience.  However, as the country continues to shift its efforts to preventing medical problems rather than simply fixing them, the spotlight is moving to the outpatient setting.  Therefore, it is equally, if not more important for those  in the medical practices to take the necessary steps to assure their patients’ experiences are top notch in this new care delivery model. 

patient engagementPositive Outcomes and Opportunities

The benefits to improving patient experience are plentiful, regardless of the care setting.  However, the Language of Caring has done a great job highlighting and explaining specific areas within the outpatient setting where increasing quality patient experience can bring about positive contributions and opportunities.  Here are the exact details they provide:

  1. Improved outcomes and healthier patients – Improved quality patient experience in medical office settings brings about optimal health outcomes. Patients are less anxious in their visits and communications with the physician and care team. The physician and other staff are more successful eliciting needed information from patients and engaging them in decisions that affect their health. Because of greater trust, they are more likely to relax and cooperate during procedures, take their medicine, adhere to their care plans and follow-up with their care, improving care outcomes.
  2. Patient retention, loyalty, and growth - By providing consistently satisfying patient experiences, medical practices and other ambulatory care centers win patient loyalty and become a provider of choice. Patients spread the word, which brings in even more patients.  As people engage in provider-shopping, services that provide a quality patient experience attract new patients via positive word-of-mouth from their current patients. Also, provider scorecard initiatives are proliferating to assist purchasers in their buying decisions. Providing a quality patient experience is a powerful growth strategy. Read the rest of this post »

Key Components to Collaboration between Payers and Providers

There is no doubt that the relationship between payers and providers is beginning to change, evolving from challenging and adversarial interactions into more collaborative exchanges. Kurt Allman, in his article in Healthcare Payer News this week, outlines 3 components for this relationship to be successful:

collaboration

  1. Data collection
    “Payers collect a lot of data, which can provide a broad picture of what is happening in a population and across the entire continuum of care. Health systems bring a rich vein of information related to specific components of that continuum.”
  2. Transparency
    “We rely on this data to make sure we know what works, and when it doesn’t work, we use the information to identify opportunities for improvement,” says Kevin Sears, vice president of payer strategy and product development at CHE Trinity Health in Lavonia, Mich.
  3. Mutual understanding
    In the past, providers worked to drive up revenue from the payer, while the payers needed to drive down costs to please their customers, both employers and employees/members. Now the two have to work together to reduce waist and improve care.

Now, we see that payers and providers must collaborate in order to truly drive value, more so than they ever needed to in the past.

When payers and providers work together to achieve all three of the above imperatives, they’ll identify opportunities that will become mutually beneficial. Each can begin by asking themselves whether their high-priority projects are working to help them to obtain higher transparency, data collection and sharing, and a mutual, more collaborative relationship with the other.

 

The Social Support Group Coming to a Provider Near You

What are the benefits of online patient communities?

I find myself answering this question quite a bit lately.  It struck me this week that I have never answered this question on the blog.  But, first things first, what is an online patient community?  Online patient communities are, essentially, condition specific socially enabled support groups.  These networks provide patients with an opportunity to connect with those that are experiencing similar challenges.  Together this collective of voices provides helpful discussion and the sharing of resources.  By their very nature, their benefits are many.  However, when they are organized by a trusted authority in care, namely healthcare providers, the benefits grow quite dramatically.

273298437_2e91c1ca70_o615

So, here is my list of the benefits of online patient communities.  Have any more to share?  I’d love to hear more from your experiences in the comments section below.

  • Social provides connections to those that are not mobile.  Let’s just be honest, appointment scheduling conflicts and transportation difficulties are typically a part of the patient experience.  It is oftentimes the case that patients and patients-by-proxy (caregivers) cannot physically attend a support group.  Any opportunity to lift barriers during the course of treatment is a welcomed reprieve from everyday turmoil.
  • Patients-by-proxy are more likely to open up.   According to Pew research, while 33% of patients participate in online patient communities, more than half of patients-by-proxy do so.    In that same survey, 34% of these caregivers actively read patient commentary about a specific medical issue online and 22% of those caregivers actively reach out to those that might have similar concerns.
  • Online patient communities provide support without bounds. Social networks are used, quite frequently, by the retail and consumer goods industries for consumer outreach purposes.  I don’t know of a loyalty program  stronger than one that could be used to save lives.     Social communities are a fabric of ties that lead to sources of support, information, and collective experience.  The goal of these communities is to foster communication between those without knowledge and experience to those that can “mentor” and provide support.  More informed patients are healthier patients.  Some of the tangential benefits of this enablement include: 1) Better understanding of health and medical conditions, 2) Improved recall of the care plan, 3) Feeling more in control of care, 4) Taking better care of themselves, and 5) Better adherence to medications as prescribed.

There are some additional benefits for the healthcare provider as well:

  • Better sample groups mean better research.  For those researchers aimed at helping through analysis, online patient community demographics are actually a more accurate representative sample of a given patient population than can be found in a traditional support group.  There are two studies that back this claim up.   One study looked at an online patient community specific to scoliosis.  Researchers found that the members of this community had similar demographics to the scoliosis population as a whole.   Another insight is taken from the fibromyalgia group on PatientsLikeMe that showed this group to be representative of those with that condition at large.  Why is this?  Breaking down geographic boundaries is a great way to also break down the socioeconomic and cultural chasms that often exist in traditional groups.
  • Time efficiencies in group care. Check out any online patient community and just underneath the surface you will find the voice of the members mentioning that they were unable to get the medical information they needed from their clinician.  So, these patients often turn to Dr. Google.  Using these communities, clinicians can provide accurate information is a mass customized format to an entire community of similar patients.  This is particularly helpful in those instances when new information or alerts need to be provided to the entire population at one time
  • Strengthens the partnership between patient and provider.  Let’s just be honest, a typical physician schedule does not often leave time for participating in support groups.  With a provider sponsored online patient community, a clinician, in the form of the community manager, is on call 24/7.  Provider sponsored clinicians that act as patient advocates to address general and condition specific questions to the entire community are a valuable asset.  Many clinicians are surprised at how different the questions patients will ask in online patient communities are from those they will ask in the doctor’s office.  For example, migraine patients will often ask Dr. Google “will I die from this?” while physicians rarely if ever hear that question in the office.
  • Social synchronization with care protocols.  When these social features are enabled through the patient portal, patients become truly enabled with knowledge.  There, within a single view, patients can take their new found knowledge and then apply that knowledge to their care protocols.  This experience can be taken a step further through gamifying that experience.  For more information, please check out “Healthcare Gamification: Is it time for Physicians to prescribe gaming to patients?” and “Beyond Gamification: Revolutionizing Healthcare with the Quanitifed Self“.

Getting Scientific About Healthcare Social Media: Medicinal Sites

© elkor 2009The journey into the (officially scientific) exploration of healthcare social media would not be complete without a look into the realm of healthcare specific networking sites that I’ll playfully call “medicinal sites.”  These are closed sites that are aimed exclusively for those with either a certain designation or disease state.

In today’s lineup, we will explore two specific sites.  One of these sites is meant for physicians and the other is meant for patients.

Doximity

Although Doximity was not mentioned in the University of British of Columbia study that spawned this blog series, I am going to start here for good reason.  Although they are a relative newcomer to the space,  Doximity has experienced very strong growth.  Last year Doximity doubled their network to a total of 250,000 members, which is 25% of all physicians in the US.  What I find fascinating about Doximity is that it was started by the AMA.  It’s oftentimes the case that, in the David vs. Goliath world of social media, hip start ups are the ones that people want to follow.  The AMA now finds themselves in a situation where they have more users of their social network than they do actual members.

Doximity does a few things right.  It’s most popular features, beyond making upgrades that make the user interface more like Facebook or LinkedIn, include:

  • An API that enables “Facebook Connect” for easy authentication
  • A built in recruiting tool called Talent Finder
  • A continuing medical education (CME) platform
  • A “digital fax line” that allows physicians to receive their faxes (I know…don’t get me started) through their network via a personal fax number

PatientsLikeMe

PatientsLikeMe is a site where e-patients can collaborate with one another in a peer-to-peer supportive setting.  The site was launched in 2004 by the family members of an architect that contracted amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) at the age of 29.  They had originally raised millions, literally, in a failed attempt to find a cure for ALS.  They also created this patient social network to go along with that effort.

PatientsLikeMe now has over 200,000 members with groups for approximately 1,800 disease states. The most popular networks are neurological diseases such as ALS, multiple sclerosis and Parkinson’s, but there has been growth in members with HIV/AIDs and mood disorders like anxiety and depression.  Cancer, with its numerous subtypes, has been a more challenging group to tackle.  I have found that these subtypes often form their own online patient communities.  You can find a list of these on e-Patient Dave’s website, which I definitely recommend you visit if you want to learn more about how patients are using social in life altering ways.

One of the most incredible things about PatientsLikeMe is not as obvious.  Let’s consider a typical patient journey: we get sick, we go to the doctor, the doctor captures data during that visit including family history, bloodwork, scans, biopsies, etc.  Then there is the follow up appointment.  Perhaps a follow up call by a nurse.  But as I often say, that’s only 1% of the story.  It is the other 99% of the time when that patient is out there in the real world that matters a lot.  So, where do we get all of that data that takes place during the “meantime”.   PatientsLikeMe is often heralded as the producer of the most compelling clinical data the health care industry has ever seen for this reason.

As compelling as this data may be, it’s only a speck of sand on the beach.  There is far better data capture to be had by socially integrating patient and physician in a meaningful way.  This takes me back.  Way back.  To a post I actually wrote in 2011.  What I said then will be where I end here today:

“Patients are online.  Physicians are online.  However, these two groups are running in different social circles…this presents a true medical problem.”

Improve care coordination with direct secure messaging #HIMSS14

Direct secure messaging (DSM) is a transmission standard promoted by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology that meets the Meaningful Use Stage 2 requirements of electronic health records (EHRs).  It works much the same way as regular email, but the message is encrypted, which prevents unintended use of the protected health information that is included within.  DSM can be used to send patient information among physicians, among provider organizations and to other 3rd parties, including patients.  

shutterstock_157839875Healthcare providers have been using direct secure messaging for care coordinating for a while but there may be ways to use it more fully to reduce readmissions, reduce unnecessary testing and procedures and even increase provider productivity.  Some benefits may include:

  1. Providers can insert secure messages into any point of their workflow.
  2. Primary care providers can interact with specialists to potentially result in fewer referrals; ultimately reducing costs to the healthcare system.
  3. Hospitals can improve transitions to nursing facilities and nursing homes can improve the communication with providers to reduce the need for readmissions back to the hospital.
  4. Medical records departments can interact with the patient send their records more easily saving them time and money.
  5. Researchers can seamlessly interact with patients on release of health sciences information.

Once HIEs are fully implemented, query based networks will provide robust data exchanges, but DSMs will continue to be valuable especially for smaller practices and hospitals that do not have the means to implement sophisticated EHRs.  Read the rest of this post »

What will it take to decrease nursing home readmissions? #HIMSS14

HIE, clinical data, quality measures, financial and claims data along with healthcare analytics – what does it take to decrease readmission rates in nursing homes?

There is so much attention these days on making the most of all of the clinical and financial data regarding healthcare, hospital readmission costs and reimbursement, but do we really know what changes can or will make a difference?

It has been a long time since I have done bedside nursing, but I can remember how often I would have one or more patients assigned to me who had come from a skilled nursing facility, long-term care facility or “nursing home.”

home_care_nursingThe American Health Care Association (AHCA), the largest association representing skilled nursing care centers in the country, reports that every year, nearly 2 million Medicare beneficiaries are readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of being discharged, at a cost of $17.5 billion. Of readmissions, one fourth are skilled nursing care patients, receiving post-acute care (recuperative or rehabilitative services).

According to the recent Office of Inspector General (OIG), Medicare Nursing Home Resident Hospitalization Rates Merit Additional Monitoring report, in Fiscal Year 2011, one quarter (24.8%) of Medicare residents in nursing homes were transferred to hospitals for inpatient admissions, at a cost of $14.3 billion for the hospitalizations. The hospitalizations were required for a wide range of conditions with septicemia the most common. While the majority (67.8%) were transferred to hospitals only once, 20% transferred two times, 7.2% transferred three times, and the remaining 5% transferred four or more times. Of the Medicare costs for hospitalizations in FY2011, care for a nursing home resident cost an average of $11,255 per hospitalization, which is 33.2% higher than the average Medicare hospitalization ($8,447). Read the rest of this post »

Getting Scientific About Healthcare Social Media: Social Networks

shutterstock_126905108Thus far we have covered both blogs and microblogs as we walk through the official scientific study that was completed by the University of British Columbia on the uses of social media in medicine and healthcare.  Today we move into the wide world of social networks.  Ask ten people in the know to define what a social network actually is, and you will get as many answers.  The study provides a legitimate definition as follows:

Social networking sites are defined as Web-browser and smartphone accessible services that allow users to create social connections in a public or semi-public form (through the use of profiles) in order to share information updates with other site users.

Today we will focus on a current leader in social networks:

Facebook

Here are some fancy facts on some pretty neat uses of social networking sites in the practice of medicine and healthcare:

  • Researchers found that most common type of groups on Facebook were peer-to-peer networks centered on specific medical conditions These groups fall into four broad categories including:  1) fundraising, 2) awareness, 3) marketing, an 4) general support
  • Researchers often join these groups as a means of disseminating information.
  • With the good come the bad.  While there are plentiful examples of epatients using online patient communities to support one another through illness, there are also a select few that self-aggregate in “negative-behavior support groups”, which are typically focused on the promotion of alcohol consumption.
  • Here’s an idea I’d love to import.  In Taiwan a well-known emergency physician blogger created a public group on the topic of improving patient wait times in the ER. The group went viral in less than a month.  A majority of emergency department staff from around Taiwan joined the group and commented.  The group got so much attention that the Minister of Health and his staff joined the group and commented directly.  As a result, the minister began making visits to ERs in ten different cities with a promise to improve funding to reduce wait times in collaboration with the Taiwanese Bureau of National Health Insurance.

One of the great features of social networks like Facebook, which have yet to be used much in healthcare are third-party applications.  Here we integrate application programming interfaces (APIs) into Facebook.  This allows outside software and data to be visualized and tied directly to the social network.  Candy Crush is likely the most popular third-party application at this time if I had to wager.  We have a long way to go until health apps are actually helpful in Facebook.  In fact, less than 30% of listed applications in the health category are real.  The rest are spam.  Of the ones that do exist, many focus on weight loss, smoking cessation, fundraising, and health education on specific conditions.  From what I can tell those are dwindling.  In fact, of the three mentioned in the study, only one still exists.

  • Get Up and Move: (no longer exists) allows users to challenge their friends to engage in physical activity and report on it after they have completed it
  • START: (no longer exists) Brought to you by the American Heart Association, this app allows users to answer questionnaires on the topic of cardiovascular health and upload the data to a health portal
  • HealthSeeker: this is a diabetes app that provides health education and the ability to win points as an incentive

In an attempt to reach as many people as possible all at once, social networks are no longer the “up and coming” medium.  They are the “here and now”.  There are many ways that Facebook is being used in medicine and healthcare, and there are still much open opportunity.

 

Creating a single best view of the patient #HIMSS14

As healthcare organizations prepare for full scale integration of electronic medical records through EHR and enterprise wide data warehouse initiatives, identity resolution is a priority for everyone. 

shutterstock_128624354A Master Person Index (MPI) is a solution intended to solve the common problem where multiple systems or applications within the organization gradually become inconsistent with the most current data.  When this information changes and only one system is updated, the MPI solution ensures that the change is propagated to all other systems to create the single best view.  The MPI may be found at the single system level, facility level, enterprise or health information exchange (HIE) level.  A “person” in the healthcare context may be a physician, patient, member, payers, etc.

Data management is one of my favorite subjects and I’m very excited about the evolution of MPIs for identity resolution, as well as, other Master Data Management solutions. But let’s focus on the benefits of the Master Person Index.  Read the rest of this post »

Getting Scientific About Healthcare Social Media: Microblogs

hashtag3-ccIn this blog series, we are highlighting the social media categories presented in “Social Media: A Review and Tutorial of Applications in  Medicine and Health Care.”  This was a study conducted by the University of British Columbia, which offers an extensive digest of the vast uses of social in medicine and healthcare.  Today we’re going to talk about the emergence of Twitter as an important communication medium in this industry.

The study correctly titles Twitter as a “microblog.”  With microblogs, we take many of the same concepts found in my previous post about blogging, namely community and collaboration, and we widdle them down to 140 characters or less.  Twitter is that place where communities of people that are interested in a similar topic, be that interoperability or Oscar night, digest a lot of information quickly together.  I rely on Twitter heavily to keep me up to date on everything related to #hitsm (health it), #hcsm (healthcare social media), #mhealth (mobile health) and #connectedhealth (I’m sure you’ve got that one without need of assistance).

The study gets extra points for classifying three broad categories of tweeting styles:

  • Substantive Tweets: a tweet that is independently understandable (e.g.,  title of a paper or blog, a brief comment, and a link to the publication)
  • Conversational Tweets: fragments of a new or ongoing conversation that draw on professional or personal interests or comment on current events. (e.g., there is no greater example of this than the Twitter discussion at HIMSS (#HIMSS14)
  • Hybrid Tweets: substantive and conversational at the same time (e.g., “let’s discuss patient engagement tonight at Sidewinder Coffee”)

According to the study, there have been over 140 documented uses of Twitter.  I’ve not met the person that is actually documenting these uses, but some favorite examples include:

  • The Pennsylvania State College of Medicine has used Twitter to augment peer-to-peer and instructor-to-student learning by stimulating topic discussions, providing feedback on critical thinking, conducting course evaluations, disseminating writing prompts, soliciting class responses, and monitoring student progress.
  • A junior doctor and a medical student started a Twitter Journal Club that functions in the same manner as traditional journal clubs, except that the means for discussion is Twitter. By using a combination of blog posts, where the paper and discussion questions are posted in advance, along with the hashtag #TwitJC, students, doctors, and anyone interested in the subject can engage and interact in a meaningful way.
  • Live tweeting surgeries and medical procedures.  Henry Ford Medical Center was the first to live tweet a surgery back in 2009.  Swedish Medical Center in Seattle has used this tactic very successfully.  One notable example was an overnight tweet up they did on sleep disorders.  Those impacted by sleep problems were able to watch what happens during a sleep study.

As mentioned above, the use of Twitter at conferences is powerful. Not the least of these examples is taking place this week in Orlando at the HIMSS conference.  At these conferences, Twitter is used to enhance learning through real-time interaction.  See for yourself by following the #HIMSS14 thread.

Getting Scientific about Healthcare Social Media: Blogs

Blog

Earlier this month, I happened upon an actual scientific study of the use of social media in medicine and healthcare conducted by researchers at the University of British Columbia.  The study was fraught with terms such as “positivistic epistemologies” and “critical-interpretivist theory” to add the requisite ambiance one finds in such studies. All kidding aside, I did find the study to be a great singular digest for how healthcare is using social.  However, while the study provided a good written history on each facet of social media, it did not go as far as to provide advice on the most effective uses of social.  This is where I’ll step in.

In this series, I will share some interesting tidbits found within the study for each category.  I’ll also highlight recommendations for the correct tactical use of these mediums.  We start with:

Blogs

The study defines blogs as “communal websites where opinions on any number of topics are voiced to create communal, collaborative dialogues.”  I really love this definition because it relies heavily on the terms “community” and “collaboration.” The general direction of this definition towards the “we” and away from the “me” points us to one of the main mistakes healthcare bloggers tend to make, which we will discuss further below.

As mentioned in the study, these are the most common hospital uses of blogs:

  1. advertise facilities
  2. share positive patient experiences
  3. feature well-known physicians who treat celebrities
  4. disseminate disease-specific information for patient education

If I had it my way, tactic #1 would largely go away, and 2 and 3 would be used with great precision.  Since blogs are about communities and collaboration, there is very little room for those that wish to crow about themselves endlessly.  Treating a blog like a media room, where press releases are repurposed for web, is not the way to go.  A person or organization should generally not talk about themselves in first person (or third person for that matter).  Instead it is about disseminating information that your intended community would find useful.  For healthcare organizations, one of my favorite topics is preventative medicine, which highlights all of the small things patients can do to make a big difference in their overall health.

There are only a few instances where healthcare organizations have been “self focused” successfully.  This is typically done through sharing positive patient experiences.  Yet, again, the organization is not talking about themselves.  They are sharing the journey a patient has had through illness or wellness and sharing that with others that may find this information helpful.  As a result, I feel that sharing patient experiences is very much in line with disseminating healthcare information to an interested community.   Here are two of my favorites:

Henry Ford: Gail’s Video Blog

There have been a few healthcare organizations that have been successful at recruiting patient guest bloggers.  Henry Ford’s blog for their Bariatric Center is one of my favorites.  On this blog, Gail records her bariatric surgery journey over the course of a few months.  Blogs like this are great because there is no sharper lens for viewing the true patient experience than through the eyes of the patients themselves.

Mayo Clinic’s Piano Foyer Video

This one was quite a viral social media accident (as most things that go viral in social media are).  An orchestra had performed within the Mayo Clinic atrium, but weren’t scheduled to retrieve the piano until a day or two later.  Enter Fran and Marlow Cowan, who were visiting Mayo Clinic as patients from Ohio.  There they found this grand piano sitting by its lonesome and decided to do something about it.  Jodi Hume, another guest seated in the atrium at the time, found the pair so entertaining that she recorded them and uploaded that video to YouTube.

To date the video has been viewed almost 10 million times, and Mayo Clinic’s name is right there in the title for all to see.  Mayo Clinic has since asked the couple to return for a second performance, which can be viewed here:

Any questions on blogging?  I’d be happy to answer them in the comments section below.

Happily Ever After: The Benefits of Patient Engagement – #HIMSS14

Once upon a time last year, in a town not too far from you, there was a big hospital where a bright, young physician was providing care to a sick, old patient.  Okay, let me save you some time.  This fairytale, unlike those you are used to, doesn’t end simply by having Prince Charming (the physician) swoop in and save the beautiful, damsel in distress (patient).  This fairytale has a bit of twist that changes the standard storyline.  This twist is referred to as Patient Engagement.

Changing of the Patient-Provider Fairytale

patientengagementThe concept of patient engagement has changed the way providers tell their patient stories.  It is no longer, once upon a time, a patient was sick, the physician cured him/her, the end.

The fairytale now reads more like this…

  1. Patient came in.
  2. Physician introduces him or her to supporting characters (care team).
  3. The patient and physician discuss the plot (disease state) with alternative endings (treatment options).
  4. They co-write the script (care plan), including ideas for props (patient education, care communities, etc.) that will enhance the story.
  5. The physician quickly publishes (uploads to portal) the manuscript and associated material for review and follow-up (provides email, direct scheduling option, mobile alerts, etc.).
  6. And instead of “the end”, it is more like, “to be continued…”

Patient engagement is not a new concept, just one that has been brought to the forefront as part of the healthcare industry’s increased efforts around coordinated care. Read the rest of this post »