<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Wave: The future of Enterprise Content Management (ECM)?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.perficient.com/ecm/blog/2009/11/12/google-wave-the-future-of-enterprise-content-management-ecm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.perficient.com/ecm/blog/2009/11/12/google-wave-the-future-of-enterprise-content-management-ecm/</link>
	<description>A Perficient Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:03:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jhodig Marcano</title>
		<link>http://blogs.perficient.com/ecm/blog/2009/11/12/google-wave-the-future-of-enterprise-content-management-ecm/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Jhodig Marcano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.perficient.com/ecm/?p=104#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Shadrach,
I agree with you about how long it would take to adopt GW, but what I really want to see adopted is the &quot;wave protocol&quot;. I strongly recommend watching the GW &quot;long video&quot; to any one who want to fully understand GW. There is a section where the creators explain the &quot;protocol concept&quot;. In a nut shell, we should be seeing MS wave, Lotus wave and almost every software company having their own wave. Even better, every enterprise should be able to implement their own wave (server/repository/interface) and then be able to interact with any other wave server.  Now the question is whether or not you as CTO would like to implement wave as internal collaboration/communication tool in your company (maybe using a custom interface that is more appealing to your users?).

About the spam: being able to deliver publicity to the right market &quot;just in time&quot; is something that has been pursued for long time and I believe it is on everybody&#039;s wish list. I also send 99% of my paper mail to the trash without looking at it, but I guess that it is still bringing good results and that&#039;s the reason we keep suffering from spamming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shadrach,<br />
I agree with you about how long it would take to adopt GW, but what I really want to see adopted is the &#8220;wave protocol&#8221;. I strongly recommend watching the GW &#8220;long video&#8221; to any one who want to fully understand GW. There is a section where the creators explain the &#8220;protocol concept&#8221;. In a nut shell, we should be seeing MS wave, Lotus wave and almost every software company having their own wave. Even better, every enterprise should be able to implement their own wave (server/repository/interface) and then be able to interact with any other wave server.  Now the question is whether or not you as CTO would like to implement wave as internal collaboration/communication tool in your company (maybe using a custom interface that is more appealing to your users?).</p>
<p>About the spam: being able to deliver publicity to the right market &#8220;just in time&#8221; is something that has been pursued for long time and I believe it is on everybody&#8217;s wish list. I also send 99% of my paper mail to the trash without looking at it, but I guess that it is still bringing good results and that&#8217;s the reason we keep suffering from spamming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shadrach White</title>
		<link>http://blogs.perficient.com/ecm/blog/2009/11/12/google-wave-the-future-of-enterprise-content-management-ecm/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Shadrach White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.perficient.com/ecm/?p=104#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I am evaluating Google Wave as well, seems like the many in th eECM community are paying attention

&quot;What do I think of GoogleWave&quot;: GW is a really forward thinking approach to business communications and networking.  It puts many of the tools you need all in one w2.0 UI.  The question is timeline for rapid adoption.  Generational shift comes in to play here, with Millenials using future communication platforms and boomers still prefering email(oldmail).  GenXers reaching out in new ways to connect with old friends, classmates and family tend to adopt w2.0 quickly, if not to say &quot;Hey I get it I&#039;m not old yet&quot;.

&quot;What would I like to see in the future as part of ECM&quot;: Mass mailing and SPAM drive me crazy.  Email spam is dated, ECM solutions need to keep this in mind as the shift continues to W2.0, the next great haven for spaming.  Also, I spend 30 minutes a week, shredding paper mail that comes to my house and business.  Ridiculous, I like a catalouge every now and then just like anyone else but give it a rest.  I don&#039;t read 99% of it, wasted resources.  Can ECM stop them?

Nice site BTW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am evaluating Google Wave as well, seems like the many in th eECM community are paying attention</p>
<p>&#8220;What do I think of GoogleWave&#8221;: GW is a really forward thinking approach to business communications and networking.  It puts many of the tools you need all in one w2.0 UI.  The question is timeline for rapid adoption.  Generational shift comes in to play here, with Millenials using future communication platforms and boomers still prefering email(oldmail).  GenXers reaching out in new ways to connect with old friends, classmates and family tend to adopt w2.0 quickly, if not to say &#8220;Hey I get it I&#8217;m not old yet&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;What would I like to see in the future as part of ECM&#8221;: Mass mailing and SPAM drive me crazy.  Email spam is dated, ECM solutions need to keep this in mind as the shift continues to W2.0, the next great haven for spaming.  Also, I spend 30 minutes a week, shredding paper mail that comes to my house and business.  Ridiculous, I like a catalouge every now and then just like anyone else but give it a rest.  I don&#8217;t read 99% of it, wasted resources.  Can ECM stop them?</p>
<p>Nice site BTW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
